# Linked Data is more important than the Large Hadron Collider
Yeah, you heard me right:
Linked Data is more important than the Large Hadron Collider
My points:
- I feel that the Large Hadron Collider is a bit of a waste of time, money and a big waste of energy (think of all the carbon emissions!).
- Why do we need to know the very very smallest parts of things?
- Why do we need to know what happened microseconds after the big bang?
- Why not just analyse what happened if the Higgs Boson was and wasn’t found (every possible aspect)?
- Face it: It’s not going to cure Cancer, or prevent HIV
- Face it: we’re still going to be here whether or not the Large Hadron Collider was successful
- Linked Data on the other hand is incredibly important
- Everything in real life (conceptual/abstract and objective/physical) is interconnected with everything else
- We have a lot of data about everything, but it’s not interconnected
- Linked Data allows for the interconnectedness of data, and therefore true computation modelling of everything. Which then allows for a real and useful insight into scientific (and artistic and historic) data!
- Just imagine a world where you can easily browse through the history of the atom, and then delve into the science found on the atom, and then go deeper into the subatomic level, and then browse back out into the historic realm, finding out about experiments that happened and whether it had any impact on society.
- Thanks to Linked Data:
- a lot of problems can be solved before they arise
- new areas of research can be formed
- “recreating the wheel” can be prevented
- a really interesting browsing experience can be achieved
So there we go. That is why Linked Data is more important than the Large Hadron Collider….
Sorry to the physics-geeks, but maybe you can gain something useful from Linked Data if you aren’t already. I know that some Chemistry and Physics people already have some Semantic Web / Linked Data research & development going on, and hey Tim Berners-Lee did start the Web project at CERN.
I fear that a lot of people within science and even computer science forget to look at things with Holistic eyes, as a lot of science and mathematics is incredibly Reductionist.
September 12th, 2008 at 10:16 am
[...] About Me Linked Data is more important than the Large Hadron Collider [...]
September 14th, 2008 at 10:36 am
[...] just read Daniel’s recent post entitled Linked Data is more important than the Large Hadron Collider. Like Daniel I am also a passionate advocate of Linked Data and am currently working on deploying [...]
September 15th, 2008 at 6:46 am
Just to clarify. This blog post is why Linked Data is more important to me than the LHC. In order to have Linked Data, I very much appreciate that we have to get the data from somewhere in order to Link it. We (in terms of the Linked Data Community) have to work with Scientists (some of which I am really good friends with).